DeFi group petitions to stop ‘patent troll’ targeting DeFi protocols


A decentralized finance (DeFi) advocacy body has asked the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to review a patent owned by a company it has accused of being a "patent troll," a company that intends to benefit from patent lawsuits.

In a 9/11 blog mail The DeFi Education Fund (DEF) said on September 7 that it filed a more than 90-page petition with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an attempt to cancel a patent owned by True Return Systems.

Granted in 2018, the patent claims a process for “linking off-chain data to a blockchain,” DEF Chief Legal Officer Amanda Tuminelli said in a Sept. 11 X (Twitter) post.

Tuminelli claimed True Return tried to sell his patent as a non-fungible token (NFT). Finding no buyer, it filed a lawsuit against DeFi protocols MakerDAO and Compound Finance in October.

"Clearly [True Return’s] The goal was to name defendants who could not respond to the lawsuit so that [it] I could get a default judgment,” Tuminelli said.

He stated that True Return would attempt to enforce the court ruling against the token holders and repeat the process with other protocols "that cannot challenge them in court or do not have the resources to do so."

DEF stated that the True Return technology in the patent is not new at the time it was granted and claims to highlight similar existing technologies, such as the interplanetary file system (IPFS) With decentralized storage platforms Sia, Storj and Swarm.

True Return Systems acknowledged Cointelegraph's request for comment but did not immediately provide comment.

Related: SEC's Gary Gensler to stand firm on crypto enforcement at Senate hearing

DEF said it launched the petition to the USPTO to defend the ability to use and develop open source software, to stop any potential True Return to plans. sue crypto projects and assist in the legal defense of MakerDAO and Compound.

True Return has three months to optionally respond to the petition, after six months the USPTO must make a decision whether to move forward with patent review, where it has 12 months to decide if the patent should be canceled.

Magazine: Hall of Flame: Crypto Lawyer Irina Heaver on Death Threats and Lawsuit Predictions