Former SEC Official Questions Lack of DOJ Action in Crypto Cases



Alex Dovbnya

Former SEC veteran John Reed Stark recently raised eyebrows with a scathing critique of the dearth of action by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) in cryptocurrency-related cases.

in a recently published postFormer Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) official John Reed Stark has expressed his bewilderment over the apparent lack of action by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) in cases involving cryptocurrencies, specifically in relation to with the matrices of an entity. called SBF.

Rigidwho has extensive experience in the field and has spent nearly two decades in the SEC's Enforcement Division, has seen what he calls an "extraordinary dearth" of U.S. Department of Justice prosecutions related to cryptocurrencies. , despite numerous enforcement actions taken by the SEC.

Stark's main concerns

Stark explicitly expressed concern about the non-inclusion of SBF's parents as defendants by the US Department of Justice and the SEC, highlighting the contrast between the SEC's abundant enforcement actions and the paucity of investigations. parallel criminal prosecutions and prosecutions by the Department of Justice in the area of โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹โ€‹cryptocurrencies.

Stark noticed that the Gemini boss Tyler Winklevoss had dismissed such accusations as "super boring," likening them to "fabricated parking tickets." Meanwhile, Coinbase and Binance treat their positions as โ€œbadges of honor,โ€ Stark notes.

The former SEC official explained that the SEC, being primarily a civilian law enforcement agency, can only impose so much restraint. Without the imminent possibility of Justice Department ProsecutionsEntities may continue to trivialize SEC regulatory interventions as mere operating costs.

Possible fraud charges against Binance

According to a Semafor report, the Department of Justice is considering filing fraud charges against binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. However, federal prosecutors are wary of the potential repercussions, such as market instability and consequences for consumers, that could result from a potential indictment and are exploring alternative resolutions such as fines or non-prosecution agreements.

Meanwhile, the Department of Justice is restructuring its National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET), aiming to bolster its ability to handle the growing volume of cryptocurrency-related investigations. This move will see NCET become a permanent segment, focusing on computer-related crimes within the department's criminal division.

Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why donโ€™t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *