The UK's recent proactive stance towards the crypto asset sector is indicative of its commitment to providing clarity, security and protection for both consumers and businesses. With these new regulations scheduled to be implemented early this month, the scope covers a wide spectrum of crypto activities, from trading and lending to custody and promotion. However, they inadvertently also add a layer of complexity, especially for foreign entities and those not yet registered, competing to gain a foothold in the UK market.
A central element of this regulatory framework is the Payment Services Act (PSA) of 2019, which lays the foundation for payment service providers and, by extension, entities involved in the cryptoasset space. The PSA defines cryptoassets as digital representations of value or rights, which are cryptographically protected and can be transferred and used for investment purposes. It is pertinent to note that these definitions exclude cryptoassets that fit neatly within the classifications of electronic money or controlled investments that already exist. Another demarcation within the PSA classifies services as digital payment token (DPT) services and electronic money token (EMT) services. The former encompasses platforms, brokers, and those involved in custody and lending, while the latter predominantly focuses on assets pegged to a fiat currency or other asset, such as stablecoins.
A notable feature of these regulations is the directive requiring all DPT service providers to be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The underlying rationale is anchored in the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Reporting Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLR). These are complex by design and force DPT service providers to maintain strict standards to combat the dual threats of money laundering and terrorist financing. This translates into rigorous customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and meticulous record-keeping, especially in scenarios where activities appear suspicious. Responsibility for ensuring compliance with the MLR lies with the FCA.
Broadening the horizon even further, the inclusion of a specific financial promotion regime for DPT services is included. This is orchestrated to integrate the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 (FSMA) within its scope. The FSMA has always been instrumental in regulating the promotion of financial products and services to consumers in the UK, ensuring they are transparent, accurate and free of misleading information. The implications of this integration are multifaceted. It means DPT service providers will now be required to provide clear warnings about risks, assess the suitability of consumers, establish a cooling-off period, especially for those new to the investment landscape, and reject certain incentives that could be considered inappropriate. .
In addition, there are plans to introduce a market abuse regime, which will expand the scope of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) to include DPT service providers. This will examine practices including, but not limited to, insider trading, market manipulation and unauthorized dissemination of information. This initiative primarily aims to clamp down on deceptive activities encompassing tactics such as spoofing, front-running, and notorious pump-and-dump strategies that have plagued many investors.
In the area of โโconsumer protection, it is worth highlighting the introduction of a legal trust requirement. What this means is that by the end of 2023, service providers would have to hold clients' assets in a trust arrangement. On this front, the FCA is in the process of formulating guidelines.
The landscape, with the arrival of these regulations, becomes a double-edged sword for crypto companies aiming to make their mark in the UK market. While clarity is a blessing, the challenges are many. Non-compliance or even partial compliance could lead companies to have to restructure their operations, which could range from customer due diligence and transaction monitoring to rethinking their promotional strategies.
For the consumer, the outlook is both protective and cumbersome. While they will be protected by enhanced protection measures, they would also have to go through increased verification processes and other regulatory protocols.
One of the main challenges is the delimitation of TED services. There may be gray areas when it comes to categorizing certain crypto assets or services under the DPT umbrella. Furthermore, challenges arise on the jurisdictional front, as the actual applicability of these regulations to foreign-based companies remains to be seen. Finally, industry adaptation is essential. The crypto industry, which has been relatively unrestrained, could encounter resistance in adapting to these regulations.
The trajectory of UK cryptocurrency regulations, while heading in the right direction, requires a harmonious effort from regulators, businesses and consumers to ensure a smooth transition and integration.
If you are interested in writing for International Policy Digest, please email us via presentations@intpolicydigest.org
