The legal duel between the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Kraken, a major cryptocurrency exchange, looks like another misguided attempt by the SEC to exert control over an industry that fundamentally challenges an outdated regulatory playbook. The agency's lawsuit, filed in November, accuses Kraken of operating as an unregistered stock exchange.
The lawsuit is not just a repeat of the SEC's past failures. It is also a glaring example of regulatory overreach that fails to capture the essence of cryptocurrencies. It reflects the agency's actions against Coinbase, which mark a pattern of aggressive regulation that is both ineffective and counterproductive. In its case against Coinbase, the SEC's allegations similarly involved operating as an unregistered stock exchange. This approach fundamentally misunderstands the nature of cryptocurrency exchanges.
The lawsuit is not just a repeat of the SEC's past failures. It is also a glaring example of regulatory overreach that fails to capture the essence of cryptocurrencies. It reflects the agency's actions against Coinbase, which mark a pattern of aggressive regulation that is both ineffective and counterproductive. In its case against Coinbase, the SEC's allegations similarly involved operating as an unregistered stock exchange. This approach fundamentally misunderstands the nature of cryptocurrency exchanges.
Related: Expect some crypto companies to go bankrupt following Bitcoin halving
Unlike traditional stock exchanges, platforms like Kraken offer a wide range of digital assets that do not fit neatly into the framework of securities. This misclassification by the SEC reveals a lack of understanding of the unique characteristics of cryptocurrencies, which function as decentralized assets, often with utility or currency-like characteristics rather than conventional securities.
One of the most striking issues is the absence of technological neutrality: the principle that regulatory frameworks should apply equally to all forms of technology, without favoring or penalizing any in particular. By forcing cryptocurrencies into the mold of traditional securities, the SEC is not only misapplying the laws, but also showing a clear bias against digital assets. This lack of neutrality not only hinders innovation, but also unfairly targets platforms that strive to work within the regulatory landscape.
The SEC's aggressive stance risks driving business away from the US toward more cryptocurrency-friendly jurisdictions. This phenomenon, known as regulatory arbitrage, could cause the United States to lose its position as a leader in technological innovation. The crypto industry is global and excessive regulation in one country simply pushes companies to relocate, taking their economic benefits and innovations with them.
Related: 3 theses that will boost Ethereum and Bitcoin in the next bull market
The lawsuit against Kraken will become another example of the SEC's failure to successfully regulate the crypto industry, similar to the outcome of its actions against Coinbase. This repetitive cycle of aggressive and ill-informed regulation is not only unhelpful but also detrimental to the credibility of the SEC. It sends the message that the regulatory body is more interested in flexing its regulatory muscle than in understanding and adapting to new technological paradigms.
The case is not just an isolated legal battle. It is indicative of a broader problem within the US regulatory framework's approach to cryptocurrencies. The SEC must move beyond its current, outdated tactics and engage with the crypto industry in a more informed and constructive manner. Regulation is necessary, but it must be reasonable, well-informed, and designed to encourage innovation, not stifle it.
It appears the SEC is set for another resounding defeat, which will serve as yet another reminder of the need for a new approach from regulators.
Daniele Servadei is the 20-year-old founder and CEO of Sellix, an Italian e-commerce platform that has processed more than $75 million in transactions for more than 2.3 million customers worldwide. He attends the University of Parma to pursue a bachelor's degree in computer science.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.
