Two Arrested In 6.6 Crore Crypto Scam | Navi Mumbai News โ€“ Times of India

Navi Mumbai: The Navi Mumbai Cyber โ€‹โ€‹Police team arrested two men from Ghatkopar in a Rs 6.62 million cryptocurrency trading scam. The two accused provided their bank account numbers, mobile numbers and ATM cards of other people involved in the crime. The accused duo have been identified as Balu Khandagale (42) and Rajendra Patel (52). In August, the complainant claimed that a woman he called befriended him and then asked him to invest in cryptocurrency trading while guaranteeing good returns. When the complainant started investing large amounts, he received a total of Rs 75 lakh in returns, but later he stopped receiving the same, the official said. George Mendonca
We also published the following articles recently.

Two arrested in Rs 6.6 million crypto scam
The Navi Mumbai cyber police have arrested two men for their involvement in a Rs 6.62 crore cryptocurrency trading scam. The accused used other people's bank account details, mobile numbers and ATM cards to carry out the scam. The scam began when a female caller befriended the complainant and convinced him to invest in cryptocurrency trading. After receiving the initial statements, the complainant stopped receiving further payments.
Two arrested for cheating Navi Mumbai onion trader of Rs 2.07 crore
Police have charged two people with cheating a Navi Mumbai onion trader of Rs 2.07 crore. The accused convinced the trader to invest in the export business by promising attractive profits. They exported onions worth Rs 3.20 million to Dubai and received payment through an illegal money transfer system. Of the total profits, the accused handed over Rs 29 lakh to the trader. The trader lodged a complaint and an FIR was lodged against the accused for fraud, breach of trust and common intention.
Man loses cryptocurrency, court says trading app not to blame
A Bengali man lost a legal battle against a cryptocurrency trading app after losing $12,484 in cryptocurrency. The consumer court held that the individual was a victim of cybercrime and that the app was not guilty of deficiency in service. The individual experienced server issues and discovered that his cryptocurrency had disappeared from his account. Despite filing a complaint and trying to claim insurance, he did not receive a favorable response from the company. He then lodged a complaint with the cyber crime unit and approached the consumer disputes redressal commission.


Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why donโ€™t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *